A first-grade teacher holds up a book and points to a word her student doesn’t recognize. Instead of helping the child sound it out letter by letter, she encourages them to look at the picture, think about what would make sense in the story, and guess. This scene has played out in countless American classrooms for decades, but it’s becoming increasingly rare as states across the nation ban this controversial teaching method known as three-cueing.
The Literacy Crisis Driving Legislative Action
The numbers tell a stark story about American reading achievement that has prompted lawmakers to take unprecedented action. According to the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), only 31 percent of fourth-grade students performed at or above the proficient level in reading—a decline from previous years, representing decades of stagnant progress.
This sobering reality has created urgency among state legislators who view literacy as the foundation for all future learning. “I firmly believe that getting literacy correct is the foundation for future learning,” said Oklahoma state Senator Adam Pugh during debates over his state’s reading legislation. The crisis extends beyond individual students to national competitiveness, with policymakers recognizing that a nation of struggling readers cannot maintain economic and social leadership in a knowledge-based economy.
The statistics become even more alarming when examining which students are falling behind. Approximately 40 percent of fourth-graders are working below the NAEP Basic level in reading—the largest percentage since 2002. These students likely cannot even recognize basic reasons for a character’s actions in a story, indicating fundamental gaps in comprehension skills that compound throughout their educational careers.
Research consistently demonstrates that students who cannot read proficiently by third grade face significantly higher risks of academic failure, grade retention, and eventual dropout. The National Center for Education Statistics data shows that reading difficulties in early elementary years predict long-term educational outcomes with troubling accuracy, making early intervention crucial for changing life trajectories.
State-by-state Bans Reshape Reading Instruction
The legislative response has been swift and comprehensive. By 2025, at least 19 states have banned three-cueing methods, with more legislation pending. This represents one of the most significant shifts in educational policy in recent decades, affecting millions of students and thousands of teachers.
Georgia’s recent action exemplifies this trend. In March 2025, the state House of Representatives gave final approval to House Bill 307, sponsored by Representative Bethany Ballard. The legislation prohibits schools from using three-cueing, which Ballard described as a method where “kids are often encouraged to sample the letters and the words in the text, relying mostly on prediction and context for comprehension.”
State Senator Rashawn Kemp, who filed a companion bill, explained the reasoning succinctly: “At the end of the day, three-cueing is not aligned to the science of reading, and it has failed too many students.” This bipartisan sentiment reflects growing consensus that evidence-based instruction must replace methods lacking scientific support.
Indiana’s experience demonstrates the practical challenges of implementation. The state’s 2023 law gives schools until the 2024-25 school year to adopt curriculum aligned with the science of reading methods and explicitly bans three-cueing approaches. Chalkbeat Indiana reported that districts like Vigo County, which had used Reading Recovery with over 5,000 students over two decades, must now transition to research-supported interventions.
Missouri joined the movement in 2025, with Governor Mike Kehoe signing bipartisan education legislation that mandates phonics-based instruction while allowing three-cueing only as supplementary material. State Representative Ed Lewis emphasized the shift: “We’ve come to the realization that phonics is crucial.”
What Three-cueing is and Why it’s Problematic
Three-cueing, also known as the MSV model (Meaning, Structure, Visual), teaches students to identify words using three information sources: meaning from context and pictures, structure from grammar and syntax, and visual cues from letters. The theory suggests students can integrate these sources to “guess” unfamiliar words.
However, cognitive science research has repeatedly demonstrated that this approach conflicts with how skilled readers actually process text. According to ExcelinEd, the method “can be boiled down to this: Teachers using this method instruct students to guess.” This guessing strategy directs attention away from letters and sounds, preventing students from developing automatic word recognition skills essential for fluency and comprehension.
Brain imaging studies using functional MRI technology have shown that proficient readers primarily rely on orthographic processing—recognizing letter patterns and their corresponding sounds. The three-cueing model encourages students to bypass this crucial neural pathway, potentially hindering the development of efficient reading circuits.
The Science of Reading Revolution
The term “science of reading” encompasses decades of research from cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and linguistics that reveals how humans learn to decode written language. This research demonstrates that reading is not a natural process like learning to speak, but rather a complex cognitive skill requiring explicit instruction.
The National Reading Panel’s 2000 report identified five essential components of effective reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. These “Big 5” skills must be taught systematically and explicitly, particularly for struggling readers who may not acquire them naturally.
Neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene’s research reveals that reading requires the brain to repurpose areas originally designed for object recognition, creating new neural pathways that connect visual symbols to spoken language. This process requires intensive practice with letter-sound correspondences, making systematic phonics instruction neurologically necessary rather than merely pedagogically preferred.
Curriculum Creators Respond to Criticism
The shift has prompted significant changes from influential curriculum developers. Lucy Calkins, whose Units of Study reading program was used in approximately 25 percent of American elementary schools, has substantially revised her materials in response to scientific evidence and legislative pressure.
In 2022, Calkins released updated Units of Study materials incorporating daily phonics lessons and eliminating three-cueing strategies. “Most educators, and I count myself among them, recognize that there are kids who need this and kids who need that,” Calkins stated in addressing the controversy, acknowledging the need for more systematic phonics instruction.
However, some researchers remain skeptical about whether surface-level revisions address fundamental philosophical differences. EdWeek reported that educators debate whether Calkins’ changes go far enough, with critics arguing that the underlying balanced literacy approach still conflicts with systematic phonics instruction principles.
Real-world Impact on Students and Teachers
The implementation of these bans affects thousands of educators who must retrain in new methodologies while serving students who may have already learned ineffective strategies. Reading Recovery, a widely used intervention program based on three-cueing principles, faces elimination in many states despite serving struggling first-graders for decades.
Georgia’s experience illustrates these challenges. The state’s legislation also removes Reading Recovery as an approved intervention program, despite its previous popularity. Atlanta News First reported that Reading Recovery of North America defended the program, with Executive Director Billy Molasso calling it “the most studied, most successful short-term reading intervention in the world.”
However, research increasingly contradicts such claims. A 2023 University of Delaware study tracking thousands of students over multiple years found that Reading Recovery’s teaching methods may actually harm children’s reading development, leading researchers to conclude the program conflicts with established scientific principles.
The Path Forward
As states continue implementing science-based reading requirements, the education community faces the challenge of supporting teachers through this transition while maintaining focus on student outcomes. Success requires more than legislative mandates—it demands comprehensive professional development, curriculum alignment, and sustained support for educators learning new approaches.
The ultimate goal remains unchanged: ensuring every child develops strong reading skills that enable academic success and lifelong learning. While the methods may be shifting, the commitment to evidence-based instruction offers hope that more students will achieve reading proficiency in the years ahead.
Transform Your Child’s Reading with Proven Methods
As schools across the nation embrace the science of reading, parents can support this important shift at home. The Reading.com app provides systematic, explicit phonics instruction aligned with research-based principles that help children build strong decoding skills while maintaining the joy of reading. Unlike methods that encourage guessing, our approach teaches children to confidently sound out words using proven techniques that work for all learners. Start your free 7-day trial today and discover how structured literacy can transform your child’s reading confidence.
